Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Barker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. The plaintiff alleges wrongful interference in the marital relations between her and her former husband. The defendants are his sister-in-law and nephew, and are mother and son. The plaintiff’s husband was well along in years when he married her. It is her claim that the defendants were actuated by mercenary motives, to obtain her husband’s property at his decease, as a reason for their alleged wrong.

The defendant sister-in-law testified that the relations between the husband and herself had been pleasant and friendly during a time preceding his marriage and continuing after it. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dulaney v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Wright v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  3. Corpus Christi St. & Interurban Ry. Co. v. KjellbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Long v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. S. Lightburne & Co. v. First National Bank of RockportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Plante v. EngelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Palestroni v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Wernsing v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Liappas v. AugoustisSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API