Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Jones v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Cahpbel-l, J:

A mandamus is asked to compel respondent to pay over to» relator the sum of one hundred and seventy-two dollars and twenty-two cents of school moneys which he has collected and failed to pay over on proper demand.

His excuse for-not paying is, first, that owing to the poverty of the inhabitants he accepted various local orders from them instead of money, and has no money on hand; and,. second, that he has had a settlement of accounts with the township, which makes him a creditor instead of a debtor to the town.

The statute is express that the township treasurer shalL pay the amount…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moore v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. C. N. Ray Corporation v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. City of Lansing v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API