Legal Opinion
Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Winchester Electronics Division of Litton Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 31, 1981No. Civ. A. 78-552PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge.
Thomas & Betts Corporation (“T & B”) charges in this action that the manufacture and sale of products known as “D” subminiature connectors by Litton Systems, Inc., through its Winchester Electronics Division (“Winchester”) constitute infringements of Claims 7 through 13 and 15 of T & B’s U.S. Patent No. 3,990,767. This patent, issued to Ronald S. Narozny on November 9, 1976, is entitled ELECTRICAL CONTACT AND CONNECTOR MEANS EMPLOYING SAME.
Winchester is a Delaware corporation. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co. Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Crane Company v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Tokyo Shibaura Elec. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Carman Industries, Inc. v. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Austin Powder Co. v. Atlas Powder Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.