Legal Opinion

Koprivica v. Sather

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 7, 1945No. 5233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

The question here raised is whether or not the owner of a placer mining claim in Alaska can resume work thereon aftér failing to perform the annual assessment work required by law and thereby thwart a relocator who has initiated his rights after such resumption and completion of $100 worth of work per single claim.

The year of failure to do assessment work alleged is the annual labor year commencing July 1, 1938, as extended by 53 Stat. page 991, to September 1, 1939. The defendants, in each of the two annual labor years following the year of said default, performed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbia Wire Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  2. Heinze v. Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  3. H. Rouw Co. v. CrivellaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. State v. LightnerOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API