Legal Opinion

Venable v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 11, 2006No. 0190051Published

1Opinion of the Court

632 S.E.2d 1 (2006)

48 Va. App. 380

James Paul VENABLE, Jr.

v.

COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.

Record No. 0190-05-1.

Court of Appeals of Virginia, Chesapeake.

July 11, 2006.

Oldric J. LaBell, Jr., for appellant.

Susan M. Harris, Assistant Attorney General (Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Present: BENTON, HUMPHREYS and PETTY, JJ.

HUMPHREYS, Judge.

Appellant James Paul Venable, Jr. ("Venable"), a convicted sex offender, contends that the trial court erred in holding that he had violated a condition of his probation. Venable reasons that his probation violation was predicated…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API