Legal Opinion

Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2015No. 13-17358PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FRIEDMAN; Dissent by Judge GRABER.

*961OPINION

FRIEDMAN, District Judge:

Commercial fishers in California are subject to a bevy of fees. For certain fees, however, non-residents are charged two to three times more than residents. Plaintiffs represent a class of non-resident commercial fishers who contend that California’s discriminatory fees violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. Because California has failed to offer a closely related justification for its discrimination against non-residents, we agree with plaintiffs and therefore affirm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schoenefeld v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Schoenefeld v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API