Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FRIEDMAN; Dissent by Judge GRABER.
*961OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge:
Commercial fishers in California are subject to a bevy of fees. For certain fees, however, non-residents are charged two to three times more than residents. Plaintiffs represent a class of non-resident commercial fishers who contend that California’s discriminatory fees violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. Because California has failed to offer a closely related justification for its discrimination against non-residents, we agree with plaintiffs and therefore affirm…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schoenefeld v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Schoenefeld v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016