Legal Opinion
Schoenefeld v. Schneiderman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 22, 2016No. Docket 11-4283-cvPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge HALL dissents in a separate opinion.
*276REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal, we must decide whether New York violates the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, see U.S. Const, art. IV, § 2, by requiring nonresident members of its bar to maintain a physical “office for the transaction of law business” within the state, when resident attorneys are not required to maintain offices distinct from their homes, N.Y. Judiciary Law § 470. Having now received the New York Court of Appeals’ response to our certified question as to the “minimum requirements necessary to satisfy” §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clement v. DurbanNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Garrett v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Baltas v. MaigaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Conklin v. Oregon Medical BoardDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Huntington Hospital v. New England Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.