Legal Opinion
Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LLC
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2013No. 1:12-CV-584Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
NORMAN A. MORDUE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The present action is one brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and the New York State Labor Law (the “Labor Law”), Article 6, § 190 et seq., and Article 19, § 650 et seq.. Plaintiffs allege that they, and similarly situated Sales Representatives in New York, were misclassified as independent contractors in violation of the FLSA and the Labor Law and were therefore deprived of their guaranteed compensation under both laws. There are five motions presently pending…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.