Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Begun

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 2, 2018No. 17–P–528Published

1Opinion of the Court

After a trial, a jury convicted the defendant of violating G. L. c. 267, § 1,2 for submitting a falsified bill of sale to his employer, the town of Shirley, for reimbursement. On appeal, both the defendant and the Commonwealth agree that count 1 of the complaint was defective for failing to allege sufficient facts that would constitute a violation of G. L. c. 267, § 1. To sustain a conviction under G. L. c. 267, § 1, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant "with intent to injure or defraud, falsely ma[de], alter[ed], forge[d] or counterfeit[ed]" one of the instruments enumerated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CantresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. LevinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. DykensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API