Legal Opinion

In re Brooke

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1900No. 280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

McPHERSON, District Judge.

I have considered carefully the testimony taken before the learned special referee, and I agree substantially with his findings concerning what took place at the first meeting of creditors. Upon the essential point I think there is no real controversy among the witnesses. They all agree that the creditors did not appoint a trustee at that meeting, but acquiesced in the appointment made by the referee. It seems to me, therefore, that little more need be said. Section 44, Bankr. Act 1898, expressly provides, that, “if the creditors do not appoint a trustee, or…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PullianDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
  2. Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API