Legal Opinion

Lupinski v. Donnell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant Donnell in an action of tort. She seeks by this bill in equity to reach and apply the proceeds of a motor vehicle liability policy to the satisfaction of the judgment. • *490G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 113; c. 214, § 3 (10). The question for decision is whether the plaintiff was a “guest occupant” as those words are defined in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 90, § 34A, as amended by St. 1935, c. 459, § 1.

The defendant Donnell was a painter and had been hired by the plaintiff’s landlord' to paint the apartment occupied by the plaintiff in colors…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Epstein v. Simco Trading Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Saragan v. BousquetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Westgate v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Muise v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milazzo v. Sentry InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  2. Pezzuolo v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API