Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover balance of salary claimed to be due.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiff was appointed as a clerk by the health department July 13, 1887, with a salary at the rate of $1,200 per annum. On December 28, 1892, the salary was by resolution of the department fixed at the rate of $1,500. On January 23, 1895, the salary was by a like resolution fixed at $1,300. The plaintiff accepted and receipted for salary at that rate under said resolution up to July 14, 1896, when he resigned. He now sues to recover $300 (being the difference between $1,300 and $3,500 per year) upon the ground that the resolution of January 23, 3 895, was unauthorized. The plaintiff is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McVeany v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Smith v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Gillespie v. MayorNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API