Legal Opinion

Fuson v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 9, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

In this case we are asked to answer one question, namely:

As between mortgagor and mortgagee or their privies, who is entitled to certain trade fixtures (in this case wall cases) which were in the building at the time the mortgage was placed thereon, after the mortgage is foreclosed?

The Chancellor found in favor of the mortgagor because “none of these wall fixtures are fastened to any part of the building, and that they can be removed without any injury to said building, although they were purchased to be used in same, and can be moved and used in other buildings.”

The pertinent facts are: Dr.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knoxville Gas Co. v. W. I. Kirby & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hartberg v. American Founders Securities Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associates Capital Corp. v. Cookeville Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  2. In re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API