Legal Opinion

In re Sheridan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 12, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to *815practice by this Court in 1985. He resides in Maryland, where he was admitted to practice in 1978.

By order filed December 10, 1999, the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspended respondent from the practice of law, effective 30 days later. The order allows respondent to apply for reinstatement no earlier than one year from the effective date of his suspension. The Court of Appeals found that respondent misappropriated client funds, failed to notify his client upon the receipt of funds, failed to provide a requested accounting, failed to keep…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mandell v. Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In re JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re BroqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API