Legal Opinion
Mandell v. Board of Elections
New York Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1996PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by reinstating the first cause of action of the proceeding by petitioners Mandell, Zunno and Gold to invalidate respondent Goldstein’s designating petition, and remitting to the Board of Elections for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.
These are two proceedings, one instituted by petitioners Man-dell, Zunno and Gold to invalidate the petition of respondent Goldstein’s candidacy for Surrogate of King’s County and one instituted by petitioner…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Buchanan v. EspadaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. MolnarNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- In re Catherine P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- City of New York v. MorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Matter of Almonte v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.