Legal Opinion

State v. Holbert

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 9, 1967No. 52240PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

The determinative issue on this appeal is whether the state adduced sufficient evidence to justify a finding by the court of guilt of the charge against defendant: carrying a concealed weapon in violation of § 564.610, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., i. e., “upon or about” his person.

It was stipulated that the testimony of the state’s witness, Officer John Reinhardt, given on a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence (on the ground of an illegal seizure of the weapon involved) would be accepted as a part of the state’s case of carrying a concealed weapon. Officer Reinhardt, a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BordeauxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. State v. DraneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. State v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State v. ConleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. State v. DugginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holbert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. United States v. NygardDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971
  4. United States v. Clifford ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. WoolbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API