Sweeney v. McLeod
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
The material portions of the complaint in this action are as follows: That on the twelfth day of December, 1886, the defendants employed plaintiff as their agent, to procure evidence to, be submitted to the legislature of the State of Oregon, which was soon thereafter to convene, or to such committee of said legislature as might be appointed to investigate the subject, that the method of taking salmon fish by means of fish-wheels at the fishery of the defendants at Celilo, Oregon, was not detrimental to the salmon fishing interests of the State, and was not more destructive of fish than other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Clippinger v. HepbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Harris v. Roof's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chippewa Valley & Superior Railway Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Stirtan v. BlethenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Herrick v. BarzeeOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- William Deering & Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- West v. Coos CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.