Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Mackie

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1917No. 22280PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; David B. Samuel, Judge. Frank Mackie was convicted for operating a blind tiger in the City of Shreveport, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Defendant was prosecuted for operating a “blind tiger” in the city of Shreveport.

The prosecution was under Ordinance No. 39 of 1915 of said city. Defendant was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100, and has appealed.

*725The first section of the said ordinance defines the term “blind tiger” in the language of section 1 of Act No. 8 of the Extra Session of 1915, and the second section prohibits and penalizes the keeping of a “blind tiger” in the city of Shreveport.

However, the ordinance does not provide, as does the statute, for search warrants and seizure of intoxicating liquors,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Ruston v. FountainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Downs v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. City of New Orleans v. VinciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. State v. DunningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Butchers' Co-op. Abattoir, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API