Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Deutsch v. Hoover, Bax & Slovacek, L.L.P.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 30, 2003No. 14-00-01459-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partScott Brister, Chief Justice

The law firm of Hoover, Bax & Slova-cek, L.L.P. sued its former client, George Deutsch, for more than $60,000 in unpaid fees. Naturally, he responded with a counterclaim; indeed, it was a word-processor-created blizzard that included lists of fifteen identical acts, omissions, and conflicts of interest, each of which was alleged to constitute negligence and breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation and (with slightly shorter but still identical lists) DTPA and fraud. Mercifully for the jury, the seasoned trial judge condensed these duplicative claims into…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API