Legal Opinion

De Vito v. Village of Elburn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 11, 1962No. Gen. 11,570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

"What happens when there are inconsistencies between a complaint and the exhibit attached to it? Do we seesaw hack and forth in an attempt at synthesis or can we pick one over the other? The answer is that we pick the exhibit. If the facts alleged in a complaint differ from the facts stated in an exhibit, the latter will control and the exhibit will be taken as the factual basis upon which the complaint is based. Benner v. Huddelson Baptist Home, 24 Ill App2d 256, 164 NE2d 252; Price v. Solberg, 269 Ill 459, 109 NE 1024. We state this rule now to enhance understanding of that which follows.

Pla…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benner v. Hudelson Baptist HomeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  2. City of East Peoria v. Colianni & Dire Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Data Service, Inc. v. Thomas Jefferson Life Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. W. H. Lyman Construction Co. v. Village of GurneeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Bauscher v. City of FreeportAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Kuch & Watson, Inc. v. WoodmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. R.W. Dunteman Co. v. Village of LombardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API