Legal Opinion
Kuch & Watson, Inc. v. Woodman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 26, 1975No. 72-351PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guild
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of its amended complaint against defendants Lorrin E. Woodman, doing business as Baxter & Woodman (hereinafter Woodman) and the Village of Gurnee (hereinafter the Village) for failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint is in four counts; the first two counts are directed against defendant Woodman and Counts III and IV are directed against defendant Village. In substance, the amended complaint alleges that in 1961 the Village and Woodman entered into a contract whereby Woodman would plan a sewerage system for the Village. In 1966 the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Miller v. DeWittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Gay v. S. N. Nielsen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Fowley v. BradenIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brooks v. Midas-International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Illinois Housing Development Authority v. Sjostrom & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Pollack v. Marathon Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Maurice L. Quinn v. The McGraw Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Bank of Lincolnwood v. Comdisco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.