Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1951No. 38,182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.;

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage suffered when plaintiff’s truck, which was following defendant’s truck, collided with it when defendant stopped suddenly in the traffic lane without giving any signal or warning to plaintiff. Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was overruled, and the order overruling said demurrer was upheld on appeal to this court (Hill v. Hill, 168 Kan. 639, 215 P. 2d 159). Inasmuch as the pertinent allegations of plaintiff’s petition are therein set forth, they will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Henderson v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Baker v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Towell v. StaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cain v. SteelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Kleppe v. PrawlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. KlaasMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Tuggle v. CathersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API