Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Richey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1891No. 14,764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

On the 1st day of May, 1887, David P. Bainer recovered judgment against Marcellus Burton and others, and on the 11th day of September, Bainer assigned the judgment to the appellee. On the 23d day of October, 1880, Richey, the appellee, caused an execution to issue on the judgment, and on the 11th day of December the sheriff sold the land in controversy to the appellee. A certificate was issued to the appellee, and, at the proper time, a deed was executed to him. At the time the judgment was rendered Burton was the owner of the land, but subsequently conveyed it to the appellant, who took…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hale v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peru Heating Co. v. LenhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Finley v. ChainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hays v. Tacoma Ry. & Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1900
  4. Vandevender v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Guard v. GuardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API