Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Slater

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1906No. Docket No. 186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ErrQr to Saginaw; Beach, J. Ejectment by Aaron P. Bliss against Daniel H. Slater and others. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This action is ejectment. The lands in question were formerly owned by Silas W. and Fred B. Tyler, from whom both parties claim to derive title; the plaintiff, under their deed to him, made May 27, 1897, and recorded two days later; the defendants, through a sheriff’s sale made May. 31, 1902, under an execution against the Tylers in favor of Daniel H. Slater, which was issued and levied May 7, 1897. All of the defendants xelv upon this deed to Mr. Slater, and the chief question Fere is whether or not he apqúired any title under it, as against the plaintiff, who bought 20 days after the levy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ludeman v. HirthMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Peters v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Daniel v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Spring v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Stearns v. PerrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilford v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Olmstead v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Campau v. FleischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API