Legal Opinion

State v. LaJoy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2007No. ED 88009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.

Introduction

John LaJoy (“Appellant”) appeals the denial of his nunc pro tunc motion in which he claims that the written judgment and sentence of the court incorrectly noted that Appellant was found to be a persistent drug offender. In his sole point on appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in its denial of his claim of a material discrepancy between the trial court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence and the amended written sentence and judgment. We reverse and remand.

*258 Factual and Procedural Background

In February, 1996, Appellant was charged with one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. CarrascoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. Eckhoff v. EckhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State of Missouri v. Brian T. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API