Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Auer v. Wm. Meyer Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 8, 1944No. Gen. No. 41,796PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

This action was instituted on June 18,1935 by E. S. Auer as plaintiff by filing what is commonly referred to as a minority stockholder’s complaint against the defendants, the Wm. Meyer Company, a corporation, and L. R. Meyer, individually and as executrix of the estate of William Meyer, deceased, Oliver hi or den and Dwight C. Hudson, directors of The Wm. Meyer Company (hereinafter for convenience referred to as the Meyer Co.).

On January 3, 1936, Charles S. Nelson was granted leave to join as copl'aintiff and on the same day an amended complaint was filed by Auer and Nelson. Defendants filed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Doner v. Phoenix Joint Stock Land Bank of Kansas CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dixmoor Golf Club Inc. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Becker v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amen v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  2. De Fontaine v. PassalinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Anderson v. LybeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lease Resolution Corp. v. LarneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FialaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API