Legal Opinion
Village of Schaumburg v. Doyle
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 5, 1996No. 1-94-0460PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
In the spring of 1993 the Illinois legislature was concerned about the lack of a statewide policy for the regulation and use of pesticides. Units of local government were free to establish their own regulatory schemes for pesticide use. Many did, including the Village of Schaumburg (the Village), a home rule unit. Nothing in the Illinois Pesticide Act (415 ILCS 60/1 et seq. (West 1992)) prevented local regulation.
The legislature addressed its concern in Public Act 88 — 345 (Pub. Act 88 — 345, eff. August 13, 1993), an amendment to section 3 of the Pesticide Act (the Act). Effective August 13,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Village of Schaumburg v. DoyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996