Legal Opinion
Security Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. Cain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 1927No. 16848PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The Security National Bank of Tulsa brought suit in the district court of Tulsa county against M. W. Cain, pleading an indebtedness on two promissory notes executed by Cain in the principal sum of approximately $4,500. Cain answered, admitting the execution of th’e notes, and by way of cross-petition alleged that prior to the execution of the notes he had entered into a v’erbal agreement with the Liberty National Bank of Tulsa through its officers, A. E. Lewis, president, and W. L. Lewis, vice president, by the terms of which he deposited with the Liberty National Bank $17,000 in Liberty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Okmulgee Window Glass Co. v. FrinkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Drovers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. First Nat. Bank of SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Skirvin Operating Co. v. Southwestern Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- First State Bank of Mangum v. LockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Leckie v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Baldwin Baker v. Saunders-Gibson Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Cooke v. Southwest Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- United States F. & G. Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.