Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. of Tulsa

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1964No. 31599PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

Mr. and Mrs. Gazzolo brought an action for wrongful death of their minor child against John E. Shepard, Jr. and Robert G. Schlottach. Shepard and his insurance company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as State Farm, then brought this action against Mid-Continent Casualty Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma, hereinafter called Mid-Continent, requesting that the trial court construe the provisions of the two policies of insurance to determine which policy provided “excess” and which provided “primary” coverage. The trial court held that State…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Giokaris v. KincaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. State Bank of Poplar Bluff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Gennari v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Colson v. Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. McNeal v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Weston v. Great Central Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API