Legal Opinion

Siskel v. Calhoun

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of being struck by an automobile belonging to and being driven by defendant at the time of the injury.

When plaintiff rested her case in chief, defendant moved for a non-suit. This motion was overruled. Defendant thereupon introduced his evidence. The cause was submitted to the jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals, assigning as the sole error the action of the court in overruling the motion for a non-suit.

When plaintiff rested her case there was competent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krieger v. DoolittleOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cline v. BushOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stuart v. Occidental Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Peters v. HockleyOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API