Legal Opinion

State v. Henson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 4, 2006No. 02C-41007; A119478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals from convictions on two counts of arson in the first degree. ORS 164.325. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for substitution of counsel, in denying his motion to dismiss Count 1 of the indictment on the basis that it failed to state an offense, and in imposing sentences based on facts not found by a jury. We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s request for substitution of counsel, that defendant did not adequately preserve his claim that the indictment was inadequate, and that the upward departures were unlawful. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API