Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Washoe County

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1949No. 3557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Washoe County, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, commenced this action in the court below to enjoin the defendant Mae Cunningham from using premises known as No. 900 East Commercial Row, in the city of Reno, as a house of prostitution. On ex parte application of plaintiff the district court issued a temporary restraining order restraining defendant from using the premises as a house of prostitution. Defendant moved to dissolve the restraining order and dismiss the action, and has appealed from the court’s order denying such motion.

The proceedings…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. L'Hote v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. George L'Hote and the Church Extension Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church, Plffs. In Err. v. City Ofne W OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Kelley v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Indies v. First Nat. Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. DURHAM, a MINOR, ETC. v. DurhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kuban v. McGimseyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Strong v. StrongNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Nye County v. PlankintonNevada Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API