Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. University of North Carolina

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1995No. COA94-725Published

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

Our review of a decision of the Industrial Commission in a case arising under the Tort Claims Act is limited to determining whether there was any competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact and whether its findings of fact justify its legal conclusion and decision. Paschall v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, 88 N.C. App. 520, 364 S.E.2d 144, 145, disc. review denied, 322 N.C. 326, 368 S.E.2d 868 (1988).

The Commission made the following pertinent findings of fact:

3. ... In the process of exiting the building, [plaintiff] walked through a plate glass window…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mazzacco v. PurcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Phillips v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Waugh v. Duke CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
  4. Paschall v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API