Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles William McHan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1992No. 91-5187PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

In this interlocutory appeal Charles William McHan, invoking the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, attempts to bar his prosecution under Count 1 of the indictment in this case for his role in a 1984-86 conspiracy and under Count 16 for his role in a continuing criminal enterprise during the period 1984-88 because he pled guilty in 1988 to an indictment charging him with a drug conspiracy in March-May 1988. He contends (1) that the 1988 conspiracy for which he had already pled guilty is in fact part of the 1984-86 conspiracy charged, in Count 1 and (2) that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Lester Dortch, A/K/A "Lightning," Wilhelm Suess, A/K/A "Wild Bill," and Floyd DortchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. MackinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. HoyteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API