Legal Opinion

Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice Mills

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 34 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtDibrell, J.

This cause was decided and a written opinion delivered on February 14, 1912, under the new statute requiring notice to be given of the filing of applications for writs of error, and providing that the Supreme Court may, in its discretion upon granting the writ of error, decide the case without a formal submission. Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice Mills et al., 143 S. W. 926. Subsequently, on June 19, 1912, upon motion for defendants in error, a rehearing was granted (148 S. W. 283). On November 13, 1912, elaborate oral argument on the part of both parties was heard by the court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Godde v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Steele v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. McNeill v. SimpsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Cox v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Jones County v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API