Legal Opinion

In re Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 19, 1932No. Nos. 239, 250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The contention of the appellant is that, by reason of the provisions of the Election Law of the state of New York, the records of the board of elections and the voting machines are so wholly within the control of the state that they cannot be directly reached by a subpoena duces tecum issued out of the United States court in a grand jury investigation.. This position is based on the provisions of article 1, § 4, of the United States Constitution, that: “The Times, Places and Manner of bolding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. In re MasseyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WallaceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1959
  2. United States v. State of AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API