Legal Opinion
Dielectric Laboratories, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1982No. 79 Civ. 1345PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Defendant American Technical Ceramics (ATC) moves for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, in this action for patent infringement arising under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281. 1 ATC contends that the four claims of plaintiff’s patent remaining in controversy are invalid on grounds of anticipation, obviousness, and prior invention. By report dated January 21, 1982, Magistrate Jordan recommended that defendant’s motion be granted on the ground of obviousness only. Both parties have filed objections to the magistrate’s report and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Lyle/Carlstrom Associates, Inc. v. Manhattan Store Interiors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Simmons Fastener Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1983