Legal Opinion

State v. Dunham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 1, 2013No. 2012-130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. The question presented by this consolidated appeal is whether a police officer’s visual estimate of defendant’s speed can support a reasonable suspicion to warrant a traffic stop. Defendants Todd Dunham and Heidi Tatham argue that a visual estimate amounts to nothing more than a mere hunch or guess, and fails to provide objective grounds for a traffic stop. We disagree and affirm the denial of defendants’ motions to suppress.

¶2. The facts in both cases are not in dispute. Just before midnight on December 10, 2011, a Vermont State Trooper, stationed in a convenience store parking lot in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. State v. SimoneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. State v. Eric K. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. United States v. Geoffrey GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API