State v. Dunham
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. The question presented by this consolidated appeal is whether a police officer’s visual estimate of defendant’s speed can support a reasonable suspicion to warrant a traffic stop. Defendants Todd Dunham and Heidi Tatham argue that a visual estimate amounts to nothing more than a mere hunch or guess, and fails to provide objective grounds for a traffic stop. We disagree and affirm the denial of defendants’ motions to suppress.
¶2. The facts in both cases are not in dispute. Just before midnight on December 10, 2011, a Vermont State Trooper, stationed in a convenience store parking lot in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. SimoneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- State v. Eric K. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- United States v. Geoffrey GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015