United States v. Geoffrey Gaffney
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentBye, Circuit Judge
I disagree an objectively reasonable officer would have had a sufficient basis to stop Gaffney’s car for speeding. Consequently, I would reverse the district court’s denial of Gaffney’s motion to suppress, vacate his conviction, and remand for further proceedings. I therefore respectfully dissent from Section II.A. of the majority’s opinion and would not reach Section II.B.
“[T]he underlying command of the Fourth Amendment is always that searches and seizures must be reasonable .... ” Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 931, 115 S.Ct. 1914, 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995) (internal quotation marks…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Michael D. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Sean SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. $45,000.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.