Legal Opinion

County of Maricopa v. Hodgin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1935No. Civil No. 3674PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— For the year 1934, the plaintiff, Barney R. Hodgin, paid his taxes under protest and then brought suit to recover them. The pleadings raise no issue of fact and, upon motion, judgment was entered against Maricopa county, ordering and directing the county treasurer of Maricopa county to repay or return said taxes, amounting to $77.90, forthwith in cash. The defendants, Maricopa county, its board of supervisors, and treasurer, have appealed.

Plaintiff claims that he was exempt from the payment of taxes for the following reasons: That the total assessment against him did not exceed $5,000, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lauman v. County of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Oglesby v. PoageArizona Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maricopa County v. Arizona Citrus Land Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Security State Bank v. County of DentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Valley National Bank v. Apache CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API