Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Hikes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1982No. 36001, CA 18896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*803HOLMAN, S. J.

This is a suit by a medical partnership (Clinic) to enjoin defendant from the practice of medicine in the area of the city of Corvallis. It is based upon a non-competition provision included in an agreement by which the Clinic employed defendant at a salary as an associate for a period of two years. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree denying an injunction.1

There is no issue concerning the propriety of the scope of the limitation in the non-competition agreement as to either area or time, because identical provisions were at issue in unrelated litigation and were found to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCallum v. AsburyOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific Kidney & Hypertension, LLC v. KassakianDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  2. Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. PeairsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Pacific Veterinary Hospital v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. PetrozzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. PetrozzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API