Legal Opinion

Kay Yew Koh v. Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 2002No. 47991-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

Normally, personal property is found, for purposes of levy or attachment, where it is physically located or where the owner resides. The interest of a member in a limited liability company is personal property. Therefore, once it has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that a defendant is a debtor of the plaintiff, an action to realize on that debt in Washington, where the defendant has a property interest in a limited liability company, is proper whether or not Washington would have had jurisdiction to determine the existence of the debt as an original matter.

FACTS

Inno-Pacifi…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. AldrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. In Re HSM Kennewick, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. McClureSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. Koh v. Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API