Legal Opinion

Koh v. Inno-Pacific Holdings, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 2002No. 47991-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

54 P.3d 1270 (2002)

Kay Yew KOH, Appellant,

v.

INNO-PACIFIC HOLDINGS, LTD., Respondent.

No. 47991-1-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

October 7, 2002.

Thomas R. Dreiling, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Richard J. Schroeder, Davies Wright Tremiane, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

Normally, personal property is found, for purposes of levy or attachment, where it is physically located or where the owner resides. The interest of a member in a limited liability company is personal property. Therefore, once it has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. AldrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Arbor Farms, LLC v. Geostar Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In Re HSM Kennewick, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. McClureSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. Deutsche Bank AG v. Devon Park Bioventures, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API