Legal Opinion

Ralph C. Richter v. Westab, Inc., and the Mead Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1976No. 75--1348PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs-appellants sued the defendants in the District Court to recover damages in the amount of $2,500,000, for breach of contract to develop a fashion design for loose leaf notebook covers and binders manufactured and sold by Wes-tab, Inc., a subsidiary of Mead Corporation. Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, and the case is admittedly governed by Ohio law.

The case was tried before the District Court without a jury. The facts are set forth at length in the Memorandum De- cisión of the District Judge, and will be referred to only briefly here in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Thomas v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. WohlgemuthOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States Ex Rel. Berge v. Board of Trustees of the University of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Dynamics Research Corp. v. Analytic Sciences Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API