Legal Opinion

Jones v. First Nat. Bank of Ashland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1938No. 7 Div. 471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The purpose of this suit in equity is to reform a mortgage and its- foreclosure deed to the mortgagee as the purchaser at the sale so as to correct an erroneous feature of the description set out in them both, relating to the government numbers.

The answer denies the execution of the mortgage, and, therefore, that there was any mistake in the description, but admits the execution of the notes to secure borrowed money, with M. F. Jones as surety. It alleges that he paid the debt and the notes were surrendered to him by the bank, the payee.

A further defense set up is- that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Fies & Sons v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Sumners v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Monroe v. ArthurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. ClaytorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Jackson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Boswell v. LongshoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API