Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hegy v. William A. White & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceShientag, J.

I concur in the result here reached in view of the special circumstances presented in this ease. I wish to point out, however, that the question as to whether the plaintiff or the defendant shall first be examined before trial is one which primarily rests within the sound discretion of the Special Term. The case of Dorros, Inc., v. Dorros Bros. (274. App. Div. 11) which gave to a defendant in commercial litigation a general right of examination before trial as broad in essence as that possessed by a plaintiff (and not limited to matters concerning which the defendant had the burden of proof…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cudlipp v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API