Legal Opinion
Cudlipp v. Watson
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.
On August 19, 1952, the defendant served Ms answer and simultaneously therewith a notice, pursuant to rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, to examine the plaintiff before trial before a Justice of this court at the County Court House on September 22, 1952.
No motion to limit or modify said notice was made by the plaintiff, nor did she elect to examine the defendant before trial by cross notice as she might have done under said rule. Instead, on August 28, 1952, she served a notice of motion, returnable September 3, 1952, for an order directing the examination of the defendant before…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Broome County Farmers' Fire Relief Ass'n v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Broome County Farmers' Fire Relief Ass'n v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Punia v. Dry Dock Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Fahrney v. EllerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Hegy v. William A. White & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Samuels v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Lowsley v. Uretzky, New York County Courts1954