Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Pincolini

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1939No. 3278PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

ORR, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding respondent $1,000 as damages for an injury sustained by him in the course of his employment by appellants, also from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial.

Appellants were the proprietors of an establishment known as the Reno Public Market, situate in the city of Reno, Nevada. Respondent was employed in the said establishment as a butcher and as a clerk. His duties were to wait on customers in both the grocery and meat departments of the store and to assist in keeping the show case stocked with cut steaks.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Haluptzok v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Napier v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Balen v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Meyer v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Roring v. Hoggard Ex Rel. HoggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Richard Matthews, Jr., Inc. v. VaughnNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cahow v. MichelasNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API