General Chemical Co. v. Blackmore
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. On final hearing on bill to set aside and declare void certain claims of defendant’s patent as interfering. Action brought under section 4918, Rev. St. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p." 3394], and the bill further prays that defendant’s patent, being a reissue, be declared void under section 4916.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The complainant is the owner by assignment of letters patent No. 652,119, issued June 19, 1900, for a “method of making sulfuric anhydrid,” hereinafter called the “Knietseh patent.” Defendant is the owner of reissue No. 11,995, granted May 27, 1902, whereof the original patent was No. 686,022, dated November 5, 1901, and both the original and reissue are for a “process of making sulfuric anhydrid,” and are hereinafter spoken of as the Black-more patent and reissue.
The first two claims of the Knietseh patent are as follows:
“1. The process of making sulphuric anhydride…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Seabury v. Am EndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Drewson v. Hartje Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Rawson & Morrison Mfg. Co. v. C. W. Hunt Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- General Electric Co. v. Richmond Street & Interurban Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Petersen v. General Seafoods Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Nikola Tesla Co. v. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.