Legal Opinion
De Korte v. Du Mond
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
The petitioner is a resident of Mew Jersey and heretofore has operated a milk station and creamery at Milanville, Pennsylvania, whereat raw milk is received from producers and thereafter shipped to buyers in Mew Jersey and elsewhere. He has now acquired property in Delaware County, Mew York, where he proposes to erect a receiving station, and for that purpose made application for a Mew York State dealer’s license for the license year ending March 31, 1947. ¡
Early in February of 1946, petitioner commenced to purchase milk from Mew York State farmers, pursuant to contracts which called for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. WickhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- De Korte v. Du MondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948